Of the 776 million square meters of existing office space across 66 markets globally, about half of that space, or 322-425 million square meters, is likely to require substantial investment to remain viable in the near term—an investment of approximately $933 billion-$1.2 trillion in spending.
That’s according to JLL’s latest research, “Opportunity Through Obsolescence.” The report found that proactive engagement to retrofit and update existing assets will be key to unlocking opportunities for value creation through strategic investment and adaptation, particularly in the U.S. and Europe, where 78% of office real estate product and 83% of necessary capex is found.
“The commercial real estate landscape is at a turning point as property owners and cities look to establish long-term viability of existing buildings and districts, in the face of evolving experiential and spatial preferences, increasing regulatory pressures, climate risk, and changes in real estate demand,” said Cynthia Kantor, CEO of project and development services at JLL. “By proactively assessing and addressing outdated and at-risk buildings, owners can unlock significant value, create a more sustainable, resilient built environment, and drive future returns.”
Considering the Risks and Opportunities of Building Age and Design
Although there is no one measurement to calculate near-term stranding risk, building age tends to correlate best with the ability to meet tenant, investor, and sustainability requirements, along with the rate of occupancy and rent growth, according to the report. In addition to significant capital needs, building age also contributes to an uneven distribution of capital investment required to keep at-risk buildings viable.
The report found that 44% of projected obsolescence is likely to be in the U.S. given higher levels of structural vacancy, along with an additional 34% in Europe, as flight to quality in select segments leads to a smaller but still significant amount of vacant product. This disconnect also exists in New York; Washington, D.C.; Paris; Chicago; and London, accounting for $242 to $320 billion of necessary global capital expenditures.
Meeting Sustainability and Regulatory Requirements
The built environment accounts for up to 42% of global emissions annually, driving pressure from the public and private sector onto building owners to decarbonize properties. Even with the rate of building emissions beginning to flatline, to meet net-zero targets, the scale of retrofitting will need to accelerate to address the more than 86 million square meters of office product in need of near-term capex across the top eight markets for regulatory stranding risk due to tightening compliance standards alone.
While sustainability requirements also incur upfront expenses, the report found there is an impressive return on investment over an asset’s lifecycle. Whole-building retrofits involving a 40% to 65% energy use reduction have an average savings of $31 per square meter per year. If applied under a medium scenario for global at-risk office product in the eight highest-risk markets for stranding, this would yield $2.7 billion in annual energy savings alone for institutional office owners, all while tenant and investor demand for low-carbon buildings continues to increase.
ALSO READ: They’re Back, but Is Your Workspace Employee Friendly?
Considering the geographic concentration of emissions, the rewards from decarbonization scale rapidly as well. For example, the report found that over 52 million square meters of current office assets across Boston; Washington, D.C.; Paris; London; Seoul; and Tokyo are likely at risk of functional obsolescence, but over 60% of emissions in these areas originate from the built environment, creating momentum to accelerate wholesale retrofitting and meet net-zero targets.
Even with asset classes earlier in their life-cycle journeys, such as data centers, sustainable solutions such as electrification and decarbonization will be important given the sectors’ significantly higher site energy use intensity, as compared to other, potentially older asset classes.
Accounting for Locational Considerations
Along with the asset- and regulation-driven stranding risks, is the growing demand for cohesive, amenitized, and balanced spaces that are attractive to all potential stakeholders, from residents to workers and visitors. Local leaders and cities shifting focus to both high-level regeneration and smaller reparative approaches to reflect such spaces are already beginning to see the benefits, according to the report.
Strategies for repurposing and retrofitting buildings vary widely across markets, with U.S. cities increasingly opting for large-scale conversion of office product to residential, hotel, lab, and other uses. In Europe on the other hand, where structural vacancy is lower, targeted interventions for specific buildings can help to achieve overarching goals from city authorities to improve the public realm and enhance placemaking initiatives aimed at attracting workers back to office-heavy business districts and create inviting neighborhoods for visitors and residents.
The full JLL report is available here.